PBS NEWSHOUR: New York Times columnist David Brooks and Washington Post columnist Ruth Marcus join Judy Woodruff to discuss the week’s news, including President Trump’s tough words for North Korea over its nuclear threat, as well as his thanking Russian President Vladimir Putin for expelling hundreds of U.S. diplomats, plus his attacking Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.
Transcript, via PBS NewsHour:
JUDY WOODRUFF: And to the analysis of Brooks and Marcus. That’s New York Times columnist David Brooks and Washington Post deputy editorial page editor Ruth Marcus. Mark Shields is away.
And we welcome both of you.
So, you just heard two very different views from our earlier expert guests on North Korea.
You heard the president again commenting, David, and now Senator Risch. How do you assess the president’s management of this North Korea situation?
DAVID BROOKS, The New York Times: Unusual, I guess.
DAVID BROOKS: It will come after the war in Venezuela, apparently, we just learned. I don’t know what that was all about.
Listen, there’s been a consensus of how to deal with this extremely knotty problem. And that is, at least on the rhetorical level, the North Korean regime is extremely fiery, extremely insecure, sometimes hysterical.
And when you’re around somebody who’s screaming and unstable, the last thing you want to do is add to the instability with your own unstable, hysterical rhetoric.
And so most administrations, Republican and Democrats, when the North Koreans say they’re going to Seoul into a lake of fire, whatever their rhetoric is, have just ignored it and relied on some underlying sense that the North Koreans don’t want to commit national suicide.
Donald Trump has gone the other way. Now, I think that is still â€” that sense that neither party wants to go into a war is still there. But the psychological probabilities that you’re going to enter into some August 1914 miscalculation certainly go up when both people are screaming at the top of their lungs…
JUDY WOODRUFF: I mean, David, people are â€” we have heard from world leaders, the Russians, the Chinese. We heard from Angela Merkel today. We hear from U.S. politicians.
Not all Republicans, but some Republicans, are joining the Democrats in saying, tone this down. But the president, no sign that he’s going to do that.
DAVID BROOKS: Yes.
Well, it could be that he thinks the North Koreans are undeterrable, and that this is not a usual regime, maybe because they have this new leader, and that you actually do have to take action. He could be â€” he believes that.
It could be he just likes to blunder. It’s always dangerous to overinterpret what Donald Trump says at any one moment. And it could be he thinks the madman theory is right theory here. And the madmanâ€¦
JUDY WOODRUFF: Remind everybody what the madman â€” because it sounds scary.
DAVID BROOKS: The madman theory is that you can be a successful deterrer if you â€” if they think you could be crazy.
And so I think it can be very effective, so long as you’re not actually crazy. And so we have a North Korean, we’re not really sure. We have a president who has his moments.
And so the madman theory, when both people could actually be crazy, is actually a very dangerous situation…
DAVID BROOKS: Yes, the only thing I would say to that is, we have all been â€” and interviewed or been around people who have been in combat. They never actually raise their voice.
If they have a message to send to the Chinese of that sort, they do it in a calm, serious way: I have been through this. I know what it is. You know who I am.
The people who raise their voices and say lock and load and say fire and fury, those are the people who have never actually been in combat. And he just reminds you so much of one of those people…
JUDY WOODRUFF: Which is what all the â€” quote, unquote â€” "expertsâ€ are saying, just calm the rhetoric down and start thinking about how we have this dialogue that’s already been started. It’s still there.
The president’s going to hold a news conference, David, they just announced, on Monday. But he’s already been talking to the press. Yesterday, he made some statements that I guess are still being dissected, one of them about President Putin of Russia, thanking him for kicking out over 700 U.S. diplomats and saying, this is going to save the United States taxpayers money.
This is something â€” what Putin did has been criticized by everybody else we have heard of, including Republicans. How do we read this?
DAVID BROOKS: Yes.
And, of course, the White House press office said it was sarcasm. Whenever Trump says something unusual, it’s always a joke.
DAVID BROOKS: And the â€” I think the significant thing here is that Russians monkeyed with our election.
And a lot of people in Congress, even Republicans, are upset by this. A lot of people around the country are upset by this have done â€” the Russians have done a lot of things to threaten the world order. And at every step along the way, including this little comment, Donald Trump always wants to walk that back, always wants to ratchet it back.
He’s willing to tweet angrily about members of his own party, about members of his own government, about anybody around the world, except for one person. And we can all eitherâ€¦
JUDY WOODRUFF: And that’s Putin.
DAVID BROOKS: And that’s Putin â€” and psychoanalyze or maybe political analyze. But it’s a consistent pattern with this guy…
JUDY WOODRUFF: Well, someone who has gotten under his skin is the Senate majority leader, as we just mentioned.
I just asked Senator Risch about it, David. The president has gone out of his way three or four times in a row now to go after the majority leader, the Republican leader in the Senate, for failing to get health care reform passed.
Does he â€” he’s venting. He’s clearly unhappy and frustrated. But does he run the risk of jeopardizing some of the other things he …read more