By Dylan Scott
The move is a new threat to the law’s insurance markets.
The Trump administration has decided to cut off crucial Obamacare subsidies that help reduce health care costs for lower-income Americans, a serious attack on the stability of the health care law’s insurance markets.
President Trump has been threatening to end the payments — know as cost-sharing reduction subsidies or CSRs — for months, but is finally following through after Republicans in Congress once again failed to repeal and replace Obamacare late last month.
The White House announced late Thursday that the administration would stop the payments. The move comes as the Trump administration is also cutting funding for Obamacare outreach and pursuing new regulations to blow holes in the law, changes that collectively threaten a program through which millions of Americans purchase insurance.
The cost-sharing payments, which were created as part of the health care law but were then the subject of a lawsuit from House Republicans, help compensate health insurers for lowering the copays and deductibles that their lower-income customers must pay.
A federal judge has found the payments to be illegal without any further congressional action. Both Republicans and Democrats in Congress have expressed an openness to funding the subsidies, which would remove Trump’s ability to nix them, but no action has yet been taken.
Some health insurers had already increased their premiums for Obamacare plans in 2018 by as much as 20 percent because of Trump’s threats to cut off the payments. A permanent end to the subsidies could imperil the law’s marketplaces in the long term and lead to even bigger price hikes in future years.
Health plans could potentially sue the Trump administration to force the payments to be made, as they have on earlier occasions when Republicans sought to cut off federal funding provided under Obamacare. States have also taken steps to prepare for the possibility Trump would pull the payments, and most 2018 rates have already been finalized. So premiums might not be immediately affected any more than they already have been.
But Trump is nonetheless introducing even more uncertainty to Obamacare’s future. As Vox has covered in great detail, a lawsuit filed by House Republicans three years ago gave him that opening.
CSRs, a crucial piece of Obamacare, were the target of a GOP lawsuit
Under Obamacare, people who earn too much for Medicaid but are still low-income — up to 250 percent of the federal poverty line, about $30,000 for one person — receive cost-sharing reductions for their private insurance. The federal government makes those payments to the health insurer to lower the out-of-pocket costs, the deductible and copayments, that those people have to pay for their health care. The less money people make, the more help they receive.
More than half of people who buy individual insurance through Obamacare got this help. About 12 million people bought health insurance through Obamacare’s insurance markets this year, and 7 million of them qualified for CSRs, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation.
The impact is substantial: A person who doesn’t qualify for a CSR and buys a typical Obamacare plan could have to pay as much as $3,609 for a deductible before her plan starts to cover her health care. But a person who qualifies for the most generous CSR — whose income is at the poverty line or only a little above it — could have to pay only $255 before the coverage kicks in.
Last year, CSR payments cost the federal government $7 billion, which means that, on average, CSRs lowered out-of-pocket costs by about $1,000 for each person.
Republicans targeted them in a 2014 lawsuit, arguing that though Obamacare had created the subsidies, Congress needed to approve them in a separate spending bill and had not done so before the Obama administration started making the payments. That made the payments unconstitutional, according to House Republicans.
The Obama administration argued that Obamacare had permanently funded the CSR payments and so it did not need any additional authority from Congress to make the payments. It also argued that regardless of the facts of the case, the House didn’t actually have the ability to bring a case because it wasn’t harmed by the cost-sharing reduction payments, a legal concept known as “standing.”
Rosemary Collyer, the judge hearing the case and a Republican appointee, first ruled in September 2015 that the House did in fact have standing to sue the administration over the payments. She then sided with the House in May 2016, deciding that the CSR payments could not be made without further congressional approval.
However, she suspended the decision so that the Obama administration could appeal, allowing the payments to continue until the case is fully resolved. The Obama administration appealed the ruling in July 2016 to the US District Court of Appeals in Washington. But litigation moves slowly, and the case didn’t advance much further in the next six months. Then Trump was elected.
Congress could approve the CSR payments, mitigating Trump’s move
Even without the CSR payments, insurers would still be required to reduce cost sharing, but they would now have to do it without the government’s help. They have said they will raise premiums dramatically to make up the lost revenue.
The irony is that if plans do raise premiums, the federal government would be on the hook for much of those costs. The government absorbs premium increases through the tax credits that help people afford coverage. The law is designed to keep premiums manageable for people, so it falls on the government to cover any excess increases.
Or, perhaps more likely, plans could eventually drop out of the market altogether.
The empty spots on Obamacare’s map have been filled in in recent weeks, but if insurers decide to leave the market, either now or later, thousands of Americans could be left without plan options as a result of Trump’s action.
“If I were an insurer, I’d just take my marbles with …read more